Am I Still a Pentecostal?
I have been a Pentecostal minister for 25 years. But that could be the most mis-leading statement I could say about myself. Hence this blog. Today I am making available Towards a Pentecostal Spiritual Theology: Some Key Issues on the Table. It is an unpublished piece, rather wordy and dense, originally designed for a theological symposium. You may or may not be interested in it’s substance but it will show you the weight of my intellectual struggle with Pentecostalism over these past years.
My thinking along this line began some six or seven years ago as I was wrestling with two key mid-life issues: whether or not I was a pastor, and whether or not I was a Pentecostal. I have since resolved both — sort of.
I have come to own the fact that I am a pastor. I mean this in the sense of being a person of word and prayer, a spiritual mentor and director, a teacher and a priest. This is a life I love and treasure. In my mind, to be a pastor is to accept the call to know God, to represent God to others as they search for clues and signs of his presence, and to help others know God for themselves. To be a pastor is a clear and focused activity which has to be guarded. My struggle, as I look back now, was to clarify the role and to resist the temptation to be a manager of the religious machinery we inevitably get tangled up in. Pastors teach and pray, create contexts of worship and community, and live as “good infections” (CS Lewis).
But the other half of my struggle has not resolved in the same way. I have not come back to Pentecostalism in the same way I have come back to being a pastor. I have become too ecumenical, too aware of the broader and deeper theological ground of the church. I resist the explanations for spirit-fullness that Pentecostals give, be-moan the shallow theology and message, and find myself out of sync with the Pentecostal culture and way of being. Simply put, I have moved to a place where the name “Pentecostal” is completely inadequate for who I am and what I am about. Over this past winter I seriously read and pondered whether or not I could make a full re-entry into the Pentecostal sphere. The answer is that I could not. There are parts of me that deeply appreciate what I have received from that form of the Christian faith, but after all is said and done, the shirt doesn’t fit anymore.
And yet… and yet I am a supernaturalist Christian who believes that the mysteries and powers of the age to come are somehow at work among us now. I hold to a Christian faith that values the more beyond our intellect and senses, a faith that seeks a living presence and not mere philosophy, a faith that is empowered by God himself and not simply self-management. I am, in essence, a Christian supernaturalist, but with a different sense from my Pentecostal roots on how this works . I want the baby without the bath water. While “pentecostal” may have lost its usefulness to describe who I am, I am also asking: is there a better title? Am I a “post-Pentecostal”? Am I simply a Christian of the “radical middle”? Is there a way forward?
In the course of this search I have given much thought to the explorations of the emerging church. While there is much to appreciate there, I find the cynicism and experimentation of some in that movement very off-putting for me. So I cannot say that I have yet identified with a group. I listen to the emerging crowd and I listen to the wider theological-evangelical-liturgical-catholic-orthodox-christian voices that are out there. I listen for clues as to what the Spirit is shaping and making in our day. I wonder if what I am going through is symptomatic of a larger shift.
What are your thoughts on this? Whether or not you are a Pentecostal, how are you doing fitting in with the form of faith you are presently attached to? The attached paper notes some of the issues Pentecostal should face (there are more), but what other issues are at play for you?